
|
Pet Products | Homepage
PetPocket Bird Carrier
The PetPocket Bird Carrier is an an unusual carrier that you carry in front of you like a reversed back-pack. The carrier would be a way for you to take a walk in the park with your bird as the listing on Doctors Foster and Smith explains.
Easily transport your bird - to the veterinarian or the park - and keep him close, safe, and secure. Hands-free, vest-style bird carrier has padded shoulder straps and quick-clip waist strap for comfort. Durable mesh fabric allows good airflow and visibility for your bird. Zippered opening at top and bottom allows access. Removable bottom tray catches messes and wipes clean easily. Includes 1/2" diameter beveled perch and two toy hanging loops. For small and medium size birds, such as parakeets, conures, canaries, finches, budgies, and lovebirds.
This probably wouldn't work for all birds - you don't want to scare your bird or make him long so much for the outdoors he or she tries to escape. On the other hand, some birds do like to be close to their owner and would probably enjoy a walk in the park. You can read a few customer testimonials here. (via Coolhunting)
Posted on July 30, 2008
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |
| |
Microchip Implants Linked to Tumors in Animal Tests
CBS is reporting that microchip implants have been linked to tumors. Studies have indicated that the chip implants "induced" malignant tumors in some lab mice and rats. The FDA has already approved microchips for humans and these studies were conducted before the FDA's approval. Unfortunately, these studies were not made public until now.
Reports indicate that 2,000 humans worldwide have already been chipped. Millions of pets have also been microchipped.
When the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved implanting microchips in humans, the manufacturer said it would save lives, letting doctors scan the tiny transponders to access patients' medical records almost instantly. The FDA found "reasonable assurance" the device was safe, and a sub-agency even called it one of 2005's top "innovative technologies."
But neither the company nor the regulators publicly mentioned this: A series of veterinary and toxicology studies, dating to the mid-1990s, stated that chip implants had "induced" malignant tumors in some lab mice and rats.
"The transponders were the cause of the tumors," said Keith Johnson, a retired toxicologic pathologist, explaining in a phone interview the findings of a 1996 study he led at the Dow Chemical Co. in Midland, Mich.
Leading cancer specialists reviewed the research for The Associated Press and, while cautioning that animal test results do not necessarily apply to humans, said the findings troubled them. Some said they would not allow family members to receive implants, and all urged further research before the glass-encased transponders are widely implanted in people.
The CBS news story says the FDA is standing by its approval of the technology. You can read more about the chip tumor link on other blogs here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Gizmodo notes that Tommy Thompson left the FDA just two weeks after VeriChip Corp's RFID chips were approved. Tommy Thompson is now on VeriChip Corp.'s board. TechDirt also makes note of this fact. Several other sources do as well although this post on Spychips.com says Thompson left VeriChip's board back in March.
VeriChip did issue a statement that says "Over the last 15 years, millions of dogs and cats have safely received an implantable microchip with limited or no reports of adverse health reactions from this life-saving product." VeriChip also argues that "laboratory mice and rats have a high probability of tumors at any injection site, regardless of the type of injection."
You can read our earlier post on microchips here. There was already confusion in the pet microchip marketplace because of a lack of a universal scanner. Now there is this news about a link to possible tumors to worry about as well.
Posted on September 10, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |
| |
Pets and Microchips
An article in the Daily Record says microchips have helped a lot of pets reunite with their owners. The article says the procedure is easier for cats than dogs - dogs may neeed to be sedated.
Microchips are responsible for thousands of happy reunions between owners and pets every year. With the large amount of lost pets taken to shelters, microchips could also keep your pet from being euthanized or sold to a new owner.
"Microchips are only about the size of a grain of rice," said Patty Hug, a veterinary technician at the College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences at Texas A & M University. "They are made to last the entire life of the pet, so once it's inserted, no upkeep or replacements are necessary."
Microchips are injected through a fairly large needle. Cats tend to cope with the injection easily, but dogs often need sedation during the procedure, says Hug. She says the best time to install the microchip is while the pet is being spayed or neutered. The pet is already under anesthesia, so it won't feel any pain.
The article says other pets besides cats and dogs also get chipped including birds, large fish and farm animals. Veterinarians and animal shelters have microchip scanners they can use to read the code on a pet's microchip. The chip's manufacturer is then called to obtain the pet owner's information. Note: the article points out that microchips are not a replacement for a collar.
Suite 101 has a helpful article about pet microchips here. The article says there are two costs involved - one to have the chip implanted (about $30 to $40 according to the article) and another $15 to $20 fee to register your pet with the the microchip company. The article also states that the two largest pet microchip companies are AVID and HomeAgain.
It all sounds very easy and uncomplicated right? Unfortunately, that isn't the case. Competition among the microchip companies has created big problems. The biggest problem with pets and microchips is that there is not a universal scanner. This means that a vet or an animal shelter could scan your pet with a scanner that doesn't recognize your pet's brand of microchip. For more about this problem read here and here.
A more recent series on Dolittler - Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 (hat tip Pet Connection) takes a longer look at the pet microchip wars.
Update: There are reports of a studies linking microchips to cancer in lab mice and rats.
Posted on August 16, 2007
Permalink | Digg this | Blog links to this post: Google | Technorati | Comments (View) |
| |
|
The Writers Write Lifestyle Network
|
|